Key messages (CI15)

Key messages 

  • The EO7 Common Indicator 15 considers marine habitats which may be affected or disturbed by changes in hydrographic conditions (currents, waves, suspended sediment loads) due to new developments.
  • The national monitoring in Mediterranean countries regarding EO7 has not been initiated yet (except for the Contracting Parties that are EU member states, and their obligation of implementing Descriptor 7 of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive), or it is just being initiated. 
  • There is no sufficient data to derive conclusions/observe trends on Common Indicator 15 on regional, sub-regional or even national level.
Figure 4
Photo by Marko Prem

Knowledge gaps

  • There are significant knowledge gaps on implementation of the Common Indicator 15. It is a complex multi-parameter indicator. The main knowledge gaps are related to insufficient surveys and monitoring of this indicator on all geographical levels, and lack of sound assessment methodologies. Assessments that estimate the extent of hydrographic alterations (knowing conditions before and after construction) and its intersection with marine habitats are currently rare in the Mediterranean, except for some local studies of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) /Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA).
  • There is certainly a lack of hydrographic data with detailed temporal and spatial scale in the Mediterranean Sea (bathymetric data, seafloor topography, current velocity, wave exposure, turbidity, salinity, temperature, etc.), which is one of the main challenges to implement this indicator, in particular to define the base-line conditions. To identify these gaps, a clear inventory of existing and available data in Mediterranean Sea should be done.
  • Other difficulties come from the use of numerical model to assess hydrographic alterations before the structure is built. These tools need substantial data (bathymetry, offshore hydrodynamics data, field data); which can be costly and time-consuming; and their use requires experience and knowledge about the processes and theories involved.
  • The link to EO1 is so essential, as map of benthic habitats in the zone of interest (broad habitat types and/or particular sensitive habitats) is required. Therefore, identifying the priority benthic habitats for consideration in EO7 together assessment of impacts, including cumulative impacts, is a cross-cutting issue of high priority for EO1 and EO7. In addition, effort needs to be given to detect the cause-consequence relationship between hydrographic alterations due to new structures and habitat deterioration.
  • To conclude, such an integrated assessment of impacts calls for additional research efforts on habitat modelling, pressure mapping and cumulative impacts, along with monitoring of potentially affected areas.